• Searching For Advice On How To Write The Review Of Literature In Dissertation

    If you are searching for advice on how to write the review of literature in your dissertation then look no further. The literature review is a review of what has already been published on a topic by accredited researchers and scholars. Most research papers require a literature review as one part of the paper, but certain teachers will require it as a separate assignment. When you write a literature review, you want to convey to the reader what knowledge exists on the topic and have ideas have previously been established. Your goal is to review the strengths and weaknesses of the existing literature. The review needs to be defined by a single concept. This concept might be your argumentative thesis, your research objective, or the problem or issue that you are discussing in the paper.

    Your literature review must do the following:

    • It must be organized around a specific research question or thesis
    • It must synthesize results into what is already known and what is not yet known
    • It must identify different areas of controversy that exist in literature
    • It must form questions that require additional research

    When you are conducting a literature review you should ask yourself the following questions:

    1. What specific research question, thesis, or problem will the literature review help to better define?
    2. What type of literature review are you conducting? Are you reviewing the effectiveness of a new procedure or issues of methodology? Theory? Policy?
    3. What is the scope of the review? What publications are being used? Will you use books, popular media, journals? What is the discipline you are working with? Is it medicine, nursing, psychology?
    4. How well did you seek information? Did you ensure your search was wide enough to gather all relevant material? Was your search also narrow enough to exclude material that is irrelevant? Did you find a number of sources appropriate for your paper length?
    5. Did you carefully and critically analyze the literature? Did you follow through a set of questions and compare each of the articles to each other? Did you discuss the strengths and weaknesses of each article? Or did you only summarize the items?
    6. Did you include studies which are contrary to the perspective of your paper?
    7. Will the reader find the review useful, relevant, and appropriate?